Legal Opinion

Entingh v. Grooters

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1999No. Docket 203303Published

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

In this land contract forfeiture action, defendants appeal by leave of this Court the circuit court order affirming a district court order that denied defendants’ motion to amend a judgment for possession by default. Defendants sought to amend the judgment to reflect a six-month rather than a ninety-day period for curing the default. We reverse and remand.

Defendants entered into a land contract to purchase from plaintiffs certain real estate in Kent County for $61,000. Defendants failed to pay real estate taxes and insurance premiums for the property as required under the terms of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Haworth, Inc. v. Wickes Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Barr v. Mt. Brighton Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Birznieks v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Erb Lumber Co. v. Homeowner Construction Lien Recovery FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API