Legal Opinion

New York Shipbuilding Co. v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On certiorari to determination of Camden Pleas in a case arising under the Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The employer admitted liability and conceded the claims of petitioner for a weekly payment of $7.91 to run for four hundred weeks. The controversy below was on the question whether there should be a commutation of this into a lump sum, pursuant to paragraph 21 of the act. Pamph. L. 1911, p. 113.

We find nothing in the case to justify the award of a lump sum. The statute says that the commutation may be ordered, “provided the same be in the interest of justice. Unless so approved, no compensation payments shall be commuted.” The amendment of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newark Paving Co. v. KlotzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  2. STATE EX REL. IOWA NAT. MUT. INS. CO. v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  3. Gianfrancisco v. Public Service Co-ordinated TransportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API