Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dillard v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1981No. 13469Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

The Court’s opinion became preordained when at oral argument a question from the bench made inquiry as to how old Dillard would be upon there emanating from this Court a final decision as to whether he will be treated as a juvenile or prosecuted as an adult. The poignant prophecy of that question — the answer to which the inquisitor knew — is embodied in footnote 1 to the Court’s opinion. There the Court frames the issue before us as whether Dillard, if subsequently “found guilty,” 1 will be under juvenile rehabilitation services for less than one year, or will be subject to death or life…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Holiday v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API