Legal Opinion
North Carolina v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 23, 2008No. Nos. 05-1244, 05-1246, 05-1249, 05-1250, 05-1251, 05-1252, 05-1253, 05-1254, 05-1256, 05-1259, 05-1260, 05-1262, 06-1217, 06-1222, 06-1224, 06-1226, 06-1227, 06-1228, 06-1229, 06-1230, 06-1232, 06-1233, 06-1235, 06-1236, 06-1237, 06-1238, 06-1240, 06-1241, 06-1242, 06-1243, 06-1245, 07-1115PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
Opinion concurring in part filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
2Per curiam
In these consolidated cases, we considered petitions for review challenging various aspects of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (“CAIR”). On July 11, 2008, we issued an opinion, in which we found “more than several fatal flaws in the rule.” North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896, 901 (D.C.Cir.2008) (per curiam). In light of the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) adopted CAIR as an integral action, we vacated the rule in its entirety and remanded to EPA to promulgate a rule consistent…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Administrator Of The United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
4Cited by2 opinions
- Catawba County v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- PPL Generation, LLC v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009