Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Teisina.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 2014No. SCWC-12-0001024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners/defendants-appellants Lesieli Teisina and Penisimani Teisina (collectively, “the Teisinas”) apply for certiorari review of the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (“ICA”) dismissal of their appeal from the “Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Allow Overbidding, to Confirm Sale, to Account for and Direct Reimbursement of Expenses and Attorneys’ Fees and to Disburse Net Proceeds” (“Confirmation Order”) for lack of jurisdiction. The Teisinas contend that the ICA has jurisdiction over the appeal because the Confirmation Order qualifies as a final, appeal-able order in the absence of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Abbott Sekaquaptewa, Etc. v. Peter MacDonald Etc., Griffin B. Bell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Greer v. Baker.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Joshua.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API