Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Tison

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 17, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Ejectment. Before Judge Sweat. Glynn superior court. December term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Gober, Judge.

In the motion for a new trial error is assigned upon this-portion of the charge: “But that, if you shall find that title to 'be true, that John M. Tison under this 'deed, believing’ that the boundaries in this deed embraced the land in dispute, and 'those holding under him, :the plaintiffs in 'this case, held it in the manner as prescribed by law, for a period of seven years without being interfered with by this defendant or defendants, the court charges you that they would as against the defendants have acquired a paramount title-to the land in dispute.” There are other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Veal v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Etowah, Mining Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Luttrell v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Heatley v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Bailey v. MotenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Southern Iron & Steel Co. v. StowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Harper v. HesterleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API