Legal Opinion

Stark v. R. B. George MacHinery Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1931No. 12513Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The defendant in error, R. B. George Machinery Company, presents a vigorous motion for a rehearing based principally upon the contention that inasmuch as the court’s special issue No. 1, which we held to be unsupported by the evidence, was an issue requested by the plaintiff in error Stark, he is estopped and precluded from contending that the evidence failed to sustain the answer of the jury to the issue. The following cases are in accord with this contention: Poindexter v. Receivers of Kirby Lumber Company, 101 Tex. 322, 107 S. W. 42; Sanford v. Nueces River Valley…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mexican National Railway Co. v. MussetteTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Poindexter v. Receivers of the Kirby Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Storrie v. CortesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Commerce Farm Credit Co. v. TorranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Crowley Mercantile Co. v. Brenard Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API