Legal Opinion

In re Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The respondent was served with a petition containing six *58charges of professional misconduct. Charges Five and Six were subsequently withdrawn. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained Charges One through Four. The petitioner now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent opposes the motion and asks the Court to refer the matter back to the petitioner for whatever action it deems appropriate. Alternatively, the respondent asks the Court to limit the sanction imposed to a public censure.

Charge One alleged that the respondent engaged in conduct…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saferstein v. Lawyers' Fund for Client ProtectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API