In re Klein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The respondent was served with a petition containing six *58charges of professional misconduct. Charges Five and Six were subsequently withdrawn. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained Charges One through Four. The petitioner now moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee. The respondent opposes the motion and asks the Court to refer the matter back to the petitioner for whatever action it deems appropriate. Alternatively, the respondent asks the Court to limit the sanction imposed to a public censure.
Charge One alleged that the respondent engaged in conduct…
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saferstein v. Lawyers' Fund for Client ProtectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006