Legal Opinion

Scinto v. Hoyte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*647The defendants did not meet their prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 352 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The plaintiff alleged in her bill of particulars that she had a medically-determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts constituting her usual and customary activities for not less than 90 days during the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Sayers v. HotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Torres v. Performance Automobile Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. McKenzie v. RedlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neuburger v. SidorukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Marmer v. IF USA Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Ismail v. TejedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. HINT, BRIAN W. v. VAUGHN, ALFRED L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Diaz v. Nightingale Bakery & Beverage Distrib., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API