Legal Opinion

Good v. Breazeale

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1963No. 874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUTHER E. HALL, Judge pro tem.

Plaintiff as payee of a non-negotiable promissory note for $27,240.86 brought suit against E. B. Breazeale and Francis Ber as co-makers thereof to collect the amount of the note together with interest and attorneys fees, less $5,000.00 paid on account of the principal.

Both defendants filed an answer in which they admitted signing the note but averred that no consideration was given by plaintiff therefor and that the note was obtained by plaintiff through fraud, misrepresentation and concealment of material facts. The defendant, Breazeale, did not appear…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Escat v. LeamanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,346 Robert L. Alley, Cross-Appellee v. Louis Miramon, Jr., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Primeaux v. LibersatSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Richard v. Foods and Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Finn v. PonsaaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Good v. BerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API