Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1934No. 8 Div. 949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The record contains two assignments of error, each relating to the granting of appellee’s motion for a new trial, from which the appeal is taken under section 6088 of the Code.

The only ruling on the motion for a new trial, shown by the record proper, and entitled, “Judgment on Motion,” is that upon submission of the motion: “To and being duly considered and understood by the court, it is thereupon considered, ordered and adjudged that the defendant’s said motion be and the same is hereby sustained.”

The bill of exceptions says that the motion for a new trial' “was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. FoleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Meyers v. MartinezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Chambers v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Clements v. HodgensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Stokes v. HintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API