Legal Opinion

Fulbright v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 16, 2011No. 10-465CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1), challenging the subject matter jurisdiction of plaintiffs claim for disability retirement pay as time-barred by the six-year statute of limitations imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (2006). The unusual posture of this case stems from plaintiffs claim that he is entitled to disability processing from active service because he later was released from reserve status due to the same disability. Argument is deemed unnecessary.

FACTS

The extracts of plaintiffs military…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API