Legal Opinion
Rourk v. Cameron Appraisal District
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided November 24, 2009No. 13-07-00684-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice BENAVIDES.
Thora 0. Rourk and others similarly situated, 1 appellants, sought a judgment from the trial court declaring that the Cameron Appraisal District (“CAD”), ap-pellee, could not assess property taxes against their travel trailers and park model recreational vehicles (collectively, “RVs”) because the RVs were not real property and the RVs satisfied a tangible personal property exemption to property taxation. See Tex. Tax Code Ann. §§ 1.04(2)-(3), 11.01, 11.14 (Vernon 2008). After a bench trial, the trial court concluded that the RVs owned by the plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. Willacy County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Las Vegas Pecan & Cattle Co. v. Zavala CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boll v. Cameron Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Rourk v. Cameron Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Builder Recovery Services LLC v. the Town of Westlake, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
- John J. Boll v. Cameron Appraisal District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- Jose A. Garcia v. Carlos Abrego, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.