Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 21, 1985No. BA-356PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
468 So.2d 1112 (1985)
James Edward SCHMIDT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. BA-356.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 21, 1985.
P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Andrea Smith Hillyer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
2Per curiam
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in departing from the sentencing guidelines more than one cell (guidelines range) without reducing its reasons for departure to writing when sentencing him for his grand theft conviction. We agree and vacate and remand for resentencing consistent with this…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Harvey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Burke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Fleming v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Vance v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Ehrenshaft v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Edwins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Thrasher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Florida · 1985