Legal Opinion

Lightbourne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 2006No. 3D05-2952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Hartman Lightbourne seeks a belated appeal from judgment and sentence rendered January 31, 2005. Because Lightb-ourne failed to file a specific motion to withdraw his plea within 30 days of sentencing, we deny his petition for belated appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i); Fla. RApp. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). We do so without prejudice to Lightbourne to timely file a post-conviction petition pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dooley v. State, 789 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that defendant is not precluded from filing a rule 3.850 motion to withdraw his plea merely…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dooley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lightbourne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API