Legal Opinion

Marino v. Meyers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 20, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Application by petitioners granted to the extent that their contempt is deemed purged and the $250 fine imposed on each is vacated, cross motion of the Attorney-General to dismiss the proceeding is *601denied, all, without costs or disbursements. This court, in a previous decision (61 AD2d 938), held that "Petitioners’ refusal to testify, as directed, was contumacious”, that "they could not, in the first instance, refuse to testify”, but provided petitioners with an opportunity to "purg[e]” themselves of contempt. In our opinion, petitioners, following this court’s decision, purged themselves of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RenaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. RenaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re GlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API