Legal Opinion

Acuff v. Proctor

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1996No. S96A0737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

Norma Acuff brought suit against Joseph Proctor to cancel a note and deed to secure debt. Proctor counterclaimed for the balance due on the note and for attorney fees. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Proctor. Norma Acuff appeals. Because the note was supported by adequate consideration and Proctor fully performed his part of the bargain, we affirm the judgment for the balance due on the note; however, we reverse the award of attorney’s fees because Proctor failed to send the notice required under OCGA § 13-1-11.

The evidence at…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Tensar Earth Technologies, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Eggleston v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Francis v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API