In Re Roeder's Estate
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Chief Justice.
Contestees, appellants here, filed for probate an instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of H. B. Roeder in the Probate Court of Bernalillo County. Appellees opposed probate of the purported will upon the contention that the first page thereof had been .substituted, for an original first page without the essentials of signing and witnessing as required by § 154-105, N.M.S.A., 1929 Comp. The Probate Court admitted the instrument to probate. After appeal to the district court, the latter found, as evidence of a possible substitution of a different first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patterson v. HickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
- Hutson v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Little Sisters of the Poor v. CushingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Wood v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Ellis v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- C. De Baca v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Mathieson v. HublerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Brown v. General Insurance Company of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re Hickok's WillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.