Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Gana

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 2015No. G048644Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MOORE, J.,

Concurring and Dissenting. — I agree with most of the majority opinion. The majority found the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness as a result of defendant taking drugs to combat her cancer (chemotherapy) and to overcome the effects of chemotherapy. (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 609.) I concur in that decision. I respectfully dissent, however, from the conclusion that the error was harmless. I also would find the court prejudicially erred in failing to instruct on unconsciousness without reference to voluntary intoxication.

Defendant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States v. Katrina Ann TingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API