People v. Gana
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
MOORE, J.,
Concurring and Dissenting. — I agree with most of the majority opinion. The majority found the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness as a result of defendant taking drugs to combat her cancer (chemotherapy) and to overcome the effects of chemotherapy. (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 609.) I concur in that decision. I respectfully dissent, however, from the conclusion that the error was harmless. I also would find the court prejudicially erred in failing to instruct on unconsciousness without reference to voluntary intoxication.
Defendant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Katrina Ann TingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.