Legal Opinion

McCarron v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 1978No. Appeal, No. 285 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Thomas McCarron and Clover Diversified Investments Corp. (Appellants) appeal the decision of the Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Lansdale (Board) denying them a variance to construct a single-family home on each, of two lots. The- variance was necessary because each lot has a frontage of 55 feet,1 while the applicable zoning requires 60 feet. The Board, denied the variance on the grounds that any *311hardship had been created by Appellants2 when they subdivided the property. The Board found as a fact that the undersized lot had been created in 1960 or 1961…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berger v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heck v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Johnson v. ZONING HEARING BD. STROUD TP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Township of Haverford v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Township of Haverford v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Broad Acres Construction, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API