Medlin v. State

* Corpus Juris-Cyc References: Intoxicating Liquors, 33CJ, p. 758, n. 80. The appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of having a still in his possession. The appeal is prosecuted upon the theory that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction.

The testimony for the state was by a deputy sheriff who arrested the appellant, and he testified that a Mr. Nabors and himself found a still on a Mr. Mitchell's place, and that the defendant, Huie Medlin, was there at the still. He further testified that he identified Medlin by a light shining upon his face when bending over at the still;…