Legal Opinion

Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Durr

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 18, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

' Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Fourth Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge ’Hurt

Reversing:

In February, 1913, tbe appellee, Mary Durr, in company with her husband, was traveling over the Louisville & Shelbyville pike, in a wagon, which was drawn by two mules, and going in the' direction of Louisville, when, near Tarascón, they met upon the road an automobile, which was owned by the appellant, Ballard & Ballard Company, and was being driven by an employee of the company, in the transaction of its business. The wagon was being driven by the husband of appellee, and at the point of meeting it was descending an incline, and the automobile was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lexington Ry. Co. v. BrittonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Bogenschutz v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. McLeod v. Ginther's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  4. Stirling v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  5. Bowlin v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Black Diamond Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Hart v. RothCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Singer v. Metz Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Daniel Boone Coal Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Ewing-Von Allmen Dairy Co. v. Fowler's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API