Legal Opinion
Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1988No. 87-4550PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
Like the proverbial bad penny, the instant dispute is back in our Court again. As before, the petitioners are primarily certain natural gas producers and other inter-venors 1 (the producers) who seek review of two orders2 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the Commission) which involve a case specific application of third-party protest procedures adopted by the Commission in the “Order 23 Series.”3 The procedures outlined in the Order 23 series were subsequently affirmed in part and modified in part by this Court in Pennzoil Co. v. FERC, 645 F.2d 360 (5th…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dallas Aerospace, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Cis Air Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Migerobe, Inc. v. Certina Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Nicor Exploration Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Joseph F. Fritz v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- South Dakota Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Maxus Exploration Company, Norfolk Energy, Inc., Arco Oil and Gas Company, Exxon Corporation, Kaneb Exploration, Inc., Okmar Oil Company, Shell Western E & P, Inc., Shenandoah Oil Corporation, Texas International Petroleum Company and Phoenix Resources Company, Kaiser-Francis Oil Company and Leben Oil Corporation, Bass Enterprises Production Company, Intervenors, Northern Natural Gas Co., a Division of Enron Corp. Peoples Natural Gas Company, Division of Utilicorp United, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mapco, Inc., Mapco Oil and Gas Company, Santa Fe Minerals, a Division of Santa Fe International Corporation, Santa Fe-Andover Oil Company, Santa Fe Braun, Inc., Danden Petroleum, Inc., Werner Oil, Inc., Cng Producing Company, and Russell Freeman, D/B/A Continental Energy, John H. Hendrix, Okmar Oil Company, Neleh Gas and Oil Company, Damson Oil Corporation, Montana Consumers Counsel, Public Utilities Commission of South Dakota and Montana Public Utilities Commission, Intervenors, Northern Natural Gas Co., a Division of Enron Corp. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mapco, Inc., Mapco Oil and Gas Company, Santa Fe Minerals, a Division of Santa Fe International Corporation, Santa Fe-Andover Oil Company, Santa Fe Braun, Inc., Danden Petroleum, Inc., Werner Oil, Inc., Cng Producing Company, and Russell Freeman, D/B/A Continental Energy, Wayman W. Buchanan, Kaneb Exploration, Inc., Champlin Exploration, Inc., Shell Western E & P, Inc., Exxon Corporation, Norfolk Energy, Inc., Arco Oil and Gas Company, Division of Atlantic Richfield Company, Intervenors, Northern Natural Gas Co. A Division of Enron CorpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.