Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Markland

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 27, 1942No. Equity 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Mrs. Loretta Hinkle Markland died testate, leaving her husband Prank Markland and certain collateral kindred as her heirs-at-law.- No children were ever born to her and her husband. By her will she gave her husband a life estate in her real and personal property, with the remainder to the complainant Daniel Elliott, whom she raised, and to her brothers and sisters. The husband dissented from the will and claimed all her estate, real and personal. The Chancellor held that he took only a third interest in the personal estate and no interest in the realty, no right of curtesy having- attached.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edmondson v. Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. D'Arcy v. Mutual Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Schaffler v. HandwerkerTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Moore v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  3. Wills v. FranklinDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
  4. Howell v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API