Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 29, 2002No. 48389-7-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

In calculating Kenyatta King’s offender score, the trial court declined to count his prior conviction for failure to register as a sex offender as a sex offense. Although the statute in effect at the time specifically excluded the failure to register as a sex offender from the definition of sex offense, this exclusion was the result of a *432numbering error. The numbering error had the effect of excluding failure to register as a sex offender from the definition of sex offense, but including failure to register as a kidnapper as a sex offense. It is clear that the Legislature did not intend this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. RocheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Jenkins v. Bellingham Municipal CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McKay v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. BraselCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. State v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API