Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 21, 2001No. 3D00-430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

785 So.2d 552 (2001)

Diana E. CASTILLO, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D00-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 21, 2001.

Scott Trell, Miami, for appellant.

John D. Maher (Tallahassee), for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

We hold that the appellant-employee's actions, which—at worst—amounted to a failure to comply with a superior's directive to produce a written statement about a work-related incident, as a matter of law, did not constitute disqualifying misconduct. See §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Underhill v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Chery v. Flagship Airlines, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Baca v. Unique Originals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Castellon v. American Skyhawk InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bigler v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Riesco v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Zavala v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API