Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Security Commercial & Savings Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 6, 1920No. Civ. No. 3247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are state4d in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought to recover possession of certain real property, the prayer being for restitution of the premises and “for the sum of eighteen thousand dollars, treble the rent due,” with costs and disbursements, and “all other and proper relief.” In the complaint it was alleged that the defendant had failed to pay rental at the rate of five hundred dollars per month, as provided in a lease, on the first of each month for the year 1915, amounting in all to the sum of six thousand dollars. A jury was called to find the amount of rent due, and a verdict was returned fixing that amount at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mason v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rabinowitch v. Cal. Western Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Cook v. Western Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Webb v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API