Legal Opinion
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 29, 2013No. Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHKPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
On August 24, 2012, after a thirteen day trial and approximately three full days of deliberation, a jury in this patent case reached a verdict. See ECF No. 1931. Samsung now seeks judgment as a matter of law to overturn certain of the jury’s findings. In the alternative, Samsung moves for a new trial. See Samsung’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, New Trial And/Or Remittitur Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50 and 59 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 2013. Apple filed an opposition…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- James Gillette v. Duane Delmore, and City of EugeneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.