Legal Opinion

Cleophas v. Walker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 18, 1930No. 40206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

On July' 19, 1919, H. 0. Haugen and C. H. Walker executed two promissory notes, payable to the plaintiff-appellant, C. Cleophas, at the Kensett Bank, Kensett, Iowa, in the amounts of $4,260.57 and $5,000, respectively, together with interest. These notes were renewals of original notes, given perhaps as early as 1909. The appellant all that time was a banker at Kensett. IT. O. Haugen, who signed the foregoing notes, was the son-in-law of the other signer, C. IT. Walker, and the nephew of appellant’s sister.

Haugen, it seems, had worked in appellant’s bank at Ken-sett. In 1909, however, Haugen…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Shawhan v. LofferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  3. State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Des Moines National Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Doerr ex rel. Rowan v. Southwestern Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peilecke v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Becker v. RuteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API