People v. Maragh
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bellacosa, J.
On this appeal, we must determine whether the use of personal professional expertise by jurors, communicated to the whole jury, constitutes juror misconduct affecting its guilty verdict so as to warrant a new trial. Jurors testified at a postverdict CPL 330.30 hearing that during deliberations they were informed of and influenced by two nurse-jurors’ professional opinions. The trial court found sufficient misconduct warranting a new trial. The Appellate Division reversed and upheld the verdict. A Judge of this Court granted defendant leave to appeal. We now…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. De LuciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. IrizarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Alford v. SventekNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. TestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. SantiNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Meyer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Kendrick v. PippinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.