People v. Baynes

Judgments affirmed. The defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of Penal Law § 70.25 (2-b) is without merit (see, People v Cusick, 119 AD2d 830). Criminal Term properly imposed the mandatory surcharge on each judgment (see, Penal Law § 60.35 [1]). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.