Ex Parte Medellin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEASLER, J.,
delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III.A, III.C., and IV,
in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Part III.B., in which MEYERS, PRICE, and HERVEY, JJ., joined.
José Ernesto Medellin filed this subsequent application, alleging that the International Court of Justice Avena decision and the President’s memorandum directing state courts to give effect to Avena, require this Court to reconsider his Article 36 Vienna Convention claim because they (1) constitute binding…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Medellin v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lovill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Leal Garcia v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Balentine v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.