Legal Opinion

United States Fire Insurance Company v. Greater Missoula Family YMCA

District Court, D. Montana

Decided May 7, 2020No. 9:19-cv-00021Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE CV 19-21-M-DWM COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant, ORDER vs. , GREATER MISSOULA FAMILY YMCA, Defendant/Counter- Claimant. Although US Fire originally filed this declaratory action, it forced YMCA to litigate to obtain coverage. An award of attorneys’ fees is therefore appropriate. See Min. W. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brewer,

69 P.3d 652, 655

(Mont. 2003); Riordan v. St. Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,

589 F.3d 999, 1007

(9th Cir. 2009); Boulter v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.,

321 F. Supp. 3d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riordan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BrewerMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Boulter v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API