Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Hanberry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant does not dispute the fact that although the decision of the local unemployment insurance office was mailed to him on March 19, 1990, he did not request a hearing until after the 30-day statutory time period to do so had expired (see, Labor Law § 620 [1] [a]). There was no evidence that *860claimant was in any way prevented from filing a timely request. Under the circumstances, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board correctly sustained the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that she lacked jurisdiction to rule on the merits of claimant’s case (see, Matter of Bush [Levine], 53 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re the Claim of AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. In re the Claim of MontalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API