Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Intervet, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 12, 2003No. CIV. AMD 03-267PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are the owners of racehorses stabled in Maryland. Defendant is a manufacturer/marketer of animal vaccines. Plaintiffs sued defendant in the Circuit Court for Kent County, Maryland, alleging state law damages claims for economic injuries they incurred when, after their horses were inoculated with one of defendant’s products against a common equine malady, the horses became ill and rendered unable to participate in thoroughbred racing. Specifically, plaintiffs allege claims for negligence, strict liability, breach of implied warranty, and breach of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Mildred MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Robert L. Mason, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006