Legal Opinion

Rand, McNally & Co. v. Hartranft

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1902No. 4307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Boyd J. Tollman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hadley, J.

This action was brought by appellant against respondents to enjoin them from an alleged interference with the contract rights of appellant to furnish certain school books for use in the schools of King county. Respondent Hartranft is the county superintendent of King county, and is ex officio a member of the board of education of the same county. He, with the remaining respondents, constitute the board of education of said county, organized under and by virtue of an act of the legislature as found in chapter 5, page 8, Laws of Extraordinary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leeper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Haworth, School Trustee of Monroe School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Curryer v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  4. People v. State Bd. of Educ.California Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westland Publishing Co. v. RoyalWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Tanner v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wagner v. RoyalWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Rand, McNally & Co. v. HartranftWashington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API