Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Maersk Line, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 24, 2005No. CIV,A, 2:05CV260Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND REMAND ORDER
REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs Motion to Remand. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs Motion to Remand is GRANTED.
I. Factual and Procedural History
From June 16, 2003, to July 28, 2003, plaintiff Roslyn N. Brooks (“Ms.Brooks”) was employed as Chief Steward aboard the MAERSK ALASKA, a vessel owned and operated by Defendant Maersk Line, Limited (“Maersk Line”). Mot. J. ¶ 2, at l. 1 At the beginning of her employment aboard the MAERSK ALASKA, Ms. Brooks found her living quarters, her cabin, and her place of work,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Pate v. Standard Dredging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Christopher Roche Juanita Roche v. Lincoln Property Company Swib Investment Company, and Invesco InstitutionalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.