Legal Opinion

O'Leary v. Buhrow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

This appeal turns on whether the jury’s findings are supported by the evidence.

There is ample evidence to support the finding that both appellant and respondent were negligent with respect to the part of the road upon which they were driving at and immediately prior to the time of the collision. The highway was marked for three ten-foot lanes. Such markings allocated the two outside lanes for travel in opposite directions and the inside lane for passing. The right of a driver of an automobile to proceed upon the right half of a highway under sec. 85.15 (1), Stats., is restricted by that same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Piesik v. DeusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamm v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Chapman v. KeefeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Vincent v. Pabst Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Vincent v. Pabst Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API