Legal Opinion

Diana Pitts v. Nancy A. Berryhill

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 16, 2019No. 5:18-cv-01617Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-EASTERN DIVISION 11 12 DIANA PITTS, ) Case No. EDCV 18-01617-AS 13 ) Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND 14 ) v. ) ORDER OF REMAND 15 ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner ) 16 of the Social Security ) Administration,1 ) 17 ) Defendant. ) 18 ) 19 20 For the reasons discussed below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to 21 Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is remanded for further 22 administrative action consistent with this Opinion. 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Andrew M. Saul is now the Commissioner of the Social…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API