Horan v. Reichert Towing Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
It was alleged in all the libels that the tug negligently grounded the scows. The tug answered by denying all negligence and alleging that the scows took the ground because of a sudden shift in the wind and change in the weather while they were in the channel and the tug was trying to take them back to safety in the harbor. Thereupon a notice of a motion to amend the libel in the Seaboard Case was filed and also the Gilder-sleeve Case, but not in the Horan Case. These amendments charged the tug with fault in not going out into the Sound to ascertain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schooner Hoppet & Cargo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- McKINLAY v. MORRISHSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Leach v. Hedger Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- The WyomissingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Second Pool Coal Co. v. People's Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Reichert LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933