Legal Opinion

Kendjerski v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1926No. 4492PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The plaintiff in error insists that the verdict and judgment in this case is not sustained by any substantial evidence. While this question is not presented by the record, nevertheless in making this elaim counsel evidently overlooks, not only that the credibility of the witness Smerk was a question for the jury, but also the further evidence of the policemen that they had given him this marked dollar; that he shortly returned with the whisky and the change; that within a very few minutes thereafter they found this marked dollar in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Browne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  2. United States v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  3. State v. CherasoOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Hayes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Cantwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API