Legal Opinion
Diamond Waterproofing Co. v. 55 Liberty Owners Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 23, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lerner, J.
On May 5,1995, 55 Liberty Owners Corp. (Liberty), the owner of a historically registered landmark residential building, *103entered into a contract with Diamond Waterproofing Systems (Diamond Systems) to repair and reconstruct its facade and roof. This contract, which was signed by Joseph Soehngen, the president of both Diamond Systems and Diamond Waterproofing Co., Inc. (Diamond Waterproofing), provided, inter alia, that any claim, controversy or breach was to be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re the Arbitration Between Blamowski & Munson Transportation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Cone Mills Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Hamershlag, Kempner & Co. v. OestrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Diamond Waterproofing Systems, Inc. v. 55 Liberty Owners Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Verizon New York Inc. v. Broadview Networks, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2004