Legal Opinion
J. D'Amico, Inc. v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 7, 1962PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
The plaintiff (D’Amico) seeks a declaration that the defendant General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. (General) is bound under an insurance policy issued by it to defend D ’Amico against claims of two defendants named Pfeffer, asserted by them (as plaintiffs) in an action in the Superior Court (Suffolk, Law No. 531,446). The ease was heard in the Superior Court upon a statement of “all the facts material to the issues.” The trial judge concluded that the insurance policy covered “the damages claimed by the . . . Pfeffers” and that General is bound to defend D ’Amico in the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Garland P. Stout v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Sheehan v. GorianskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- United Electric Light Co. v. Deliso Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Terrio v. McDONOUGH HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- VAPPI & CO. INC. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Magoun v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- York Industrial Center, Inc. v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.