Legal Opinion

The People v. Flores

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 2013No. A135252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, P. J.

In this case, we are called upon to determine whether substantial evidence supports the conviction of defendant Armando Gonzales Flores regarding the attack on an elderly man by a pit bull owned by defendant. California does not criminalize mere ownership of a pit bull or any similar animal. However, if a person knows his or her animal is mischievous and fails to exercise ordinary care, and as a result a human being suffers serious bodily injury or death, that person may be prosecuted pursuant to Penal Code 1 section 399. On appeal, defendant maintains he used ordinary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. EscobarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. SandgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. People v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Adams CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API