Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Green

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2002No. 00-1392-CRPublished

1Concurrence

¶ 43. SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

(concurring). In the present case, the defendant argues that the State violated the circuit court's witness "sequestration" order when the prosecutor communicated with a State's witness during a break in that witness's trial testimony.1 If the attorney violated the court order, the error was harmless.

¶ 44. I write separately to urge that exclusion and separation orders be stated with particularity to avoid misunderstandings.2 Although the practice of limiting a witness's access to other witnesses can be traced to English and Germanic law,3 many open…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. George Crutcher, Hampton C. Hazel, Also Known as Robert Jones, and John PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. The PEOPLE v. NobleIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. United States v. VenutoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  5. State v. FerronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API