Legal Opinion

Smart Workout, Inc. v. Environmental Control Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Three administrative determinations of respondent, dated October 29, 2009, imposing a total of $5,500 in fines for 74 violations of New York City Administrative Code § 10-119, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Alice *493Schlesinger, J.], entered June 16, 2010), dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner failed to offer any admissible evidence to refute the testimony of respondent’s agents that violations had been issued only for those handbills affixed to City…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sulzer v. Environmental Control BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cheong Mei Inc. v. Environmental Control BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. CBA Industries, Inc. v. BeddoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. CBA Industries, Inc. v. BeddoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API