Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Myers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1913No. 18,382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Brown district court; W. F. Means, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiff, S. R. Farmer, sued to recover $580.50 and interest alleged to be due on two promissory notes. The answer alleged among other things that E. T. Wells and S. R. Farmer were partners as the Wells-Farmer Auto Company and hired ■defendant S. F. Myers to work for them under a written contract by which it was agreed that Myers was to have a car at an agreed price of about $2000 and furnish it to the auto company for use as a demonstrator .and for general livery business, the company to pay him $25 a month, he to have one-half of the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. MorgensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API