Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Lansing Conduit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

Claimant asserted that he had sustained work-related hearing loss in both ears and filed the present workers’ compensation claim. An investigation revealed that Reliance National Insurance Company had provided workers’ compensation insurance coverage to the employer from January to July 1996. The Workers’ Compensation Board ultimately determined that the date of claimant’s disablement was March 13, 1996 and held that, if the claim is established, Reliance would be the responsible carrier. Reliance and its third-party administrator (hereinafter collectively referred to as Reliance), as well as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Ovando v. Hanover Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Claim of Senay v. BH Motto & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Claim of Di Matteo v. T. M. Duche & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Szewczuk v. ETS Contr., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Claim of Cerbasi v. County Metal & Glass, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Claim of Cerbasi v. County Metal & Glass, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API