Legal Opinion

United States v. Roman Magana-Olvera

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 1990No. 88-3280PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

Roman Magana-Olvera (“Magana”) appeals his convictions resulting from a Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) undercover operation in Pasco, Washington. Magana claims that he was tried in violation of The Speedy Trial Act of 1974, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-64 (1988). He further claims that the admission of certain hearsay statements at trial violated his sixth amendment right to confront his accusers. Finally, he claims that the district court improperly sentenced him. 1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentencing.

I

A

As the drug epidemic in Washington…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Milton Edward BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Jaleh NazemianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Daniel James FowlieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Barbara Gail Harrison-PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API