Legal Opinion

Armour and Company v. John A. Nard, Armour and Company v. John A. Nard

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1972No. 71-1433, 71-1444PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Armour and Company (Armour) originally brought this action against defendant contractor, John A. Nard (Nard) for delay damages caused by Nard’s alleged breach in the performance of a written cost-plus (15%) building construction contract entered into by the parties on September 6, 1968 for the construction of an Armour hog-cut facility in Sioux City, Iowa. Nard denied there was any breach on his part and counterclaimed for delay damages and 15% commission due on the project. Armour’s claim for delay damages was submitted to the jury which returned a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Maytag Company v. AlwardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Washington Construction Co., Inc. v. SpinellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  5. Hawkins v. Missouri Pac. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Currence v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Franklin E. Bond v. Local Union 823, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. All West Pet Supply Co. v. Hill's Pet Products DivisionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. International Minerals & Resources v. Bomar Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API